![]() The first step is to identify the last "good" commit and provide its hash to the rebase command: $ git rebase -i -p 0ad14fa5 Use it with care (and possibly read up on it)! However, being as powerful as it is, this also means you can very easily shoot yourself in the foot. Interactive Rebase is the Swiss Army Knife of tools in Git: it allows you to do and change almost anything. This effectively replaces the last commit with your "edited" version, correcting the wrong author information. In case you want to change just the very last commit, Git offers a very easy way to do this: git commit -amend -author="John Doe " There are three basic ways to edit your past commits: Using -amend for the Very Last Commit Therefore, think twice before you rewrite your commit history! This is nothing to take lightly: you will create new commit objects in this process, which can become a serious problem for your collaborators - because they might have already based new work on some of the original commits. No matter how exactly we change the information of past commits, there's one thing to always keep in mind: if we do this, we are effectively rewriting commit history. Note Editing Past Commits Rewrites History! Although I did create an app that allows you generate ObjectId compatible values (see it here Mongo ObjectId Generator).Īll the test and a quick explanation of what we’re doing and why we’re doing it, culminating in our glorious use of fineProperty, is on GitHub /HugoDF/mock-mongo-object-id. We don’t want actual ObjectIds strewn around our code. It’s useful to testing code that uses things like Mongo’s ObjectId. That’s great for setting functions as method mocks. The gist of fineProperty use with a function value boils down to:Ĭonst obj = console.log(obj.yes()) // false or true depending on the call :D As you can see, the yes property is not enumerated, but it does exist. non-enumerable properties that are functions. This post goes through how to use fineProperty to mock how constructors create methods, ie. #javascript JavaScript fineProperty for a function: create mock object instances in Jest or AVA Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart. No rebase(s): merge the remote branch into local ![]() We’re now going to explore how to achieve a state in the local branch where the remote won’t reject the push. How can you get your local branch back to a state that’s pushable? These 2 cases should be dealt with differently. There tend to be 2 types of changes to the remote branch: someone added commits or someone modified the history of the branch (usually some sort of rebase). ![]() “the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart” means that there have been changes on the remote branch that you don’t have locally. Remotes are useful to share your work or collaborate on a branch. a GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/self-hosted Git server repository instance). A remote equates roughly to a place where you git repository is hosted (eg. ![]() A remote branch is one that exists on the remote location (most repositories usually have a remote called origin). A local branch is a branch that exists in your local version of the git repository. ![]() Git works with the concept of local and remote branches. What causes ”tip of your current branch is behind”? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |